- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 13 July 2023
- Bench
- S Justice S.Srimathy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 15065/2023
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition is filed challenging the Impugned Order, dated
16.02.2023 with a consequential direction to the 3rd respondent to release the vehicle.
¶2The contention of the petitioner is that the respondents have issued a Show Cause notice on 02.02.2013 and he has submitted his explanation on 15.02.2023. As per Section 14(4) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937, the petitioner should submit his explanation not exceeding the period of 14 days. Hence the petitioner ought to have submitted his explanation on or before 15.02.2023, but he posted his explanation on
15.02.2023 and the respondents received the explanation the next day only i.e. on 16.02.2023.
¶3However, the respondents submitted that the petitioner should have submitted his explanation on or before 15.02.2023 and the respondents have not received the same on or before 15.02.2023. Since the respondents had received the explanation beyond the prescribed time i.e. on 16.02.2023, the same cannot be entertained.
¶4It is seen from the record that the petitioner has posted the reply on 15.02.2023, which is evident from the postal receipts. Therefore, this Court is of the considered opinion that the respondents ought to have taken the dispatch date and not the date of receipt. Therefore, the petitioner has posted his reply within a period of 14 days which is within the prescribed time. Therefore, this Court is inclined to interfere with the impugned order and the same is liable to be quashed.
¶5Accordingly, the impugned order, dated 16.02.2023 is hereby quashed. The respondents shall consider the explanation and pass an order afresh, after issuing notice to both the parties after affording personal hearing.
¶6With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, W.M.P.(MD)No. 12671 is allowed and W.M.P(MD)No. 12672 of 2023 is closed.
13.07.2023
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ksa To
1.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.
¶2The Additional Superintendent of Police, Prohibition Enforcement Wing, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.
¶3The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Prohibition Enforcement Wing, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.
¶4The Inspector of Police, Prohibition Enforcement Wing, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.
S.SRIMATHY, J.
ksa W.P.(MD).No.15065 of 2021
13.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and W.M.P(MD)Nos.12671 & 12672 of 2023 S.Rajavel ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur. 2. The Additional Superintendent of Police, Prohibition Enforcement Wing, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Prohibition Enforcement Wing, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District. 4. The Inspector of Police, Prohibition Enforcement Wing, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the Impugned Order, dated 16.02.2023 in Na.Ka.No.Con. 01/PEW/TAN/2023 on the file of the 3rd Respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to release the Petitioners Mahindra XUV 300 bearing registration No.TN-68-AF-5558 seized by the 4th Respondent on 16.01.2023 by considering the Petitioner's representation, dated 09.03.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Maheswaran For Respondents : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.