VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Kannan.R.S v. The Director of Town and Country Planning

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 November 2023
Bench
N. Anand Venkateshauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 16537/2021

Judgment

O RDER

This writ petition has been filed for the issue of writ of mandamus directing the official respondents not to grant any planning approval or building permission within 300 meters from the quarrying site that is being run by the petitioner in the light of Rule 36 (1-A) of the Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959.

2.The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the official respondents submitted that the writ petition has been filed merely on the basis of apprehension without any materials. He further submitted that no planning approval or building permission will be granted within 300 meters from the quarrying site in accordance with the Rules and that no such application has been made before the concerned authority till date.

3.Recording the above, this Writ Petition is disposed of . No costs.

07.11.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ta To

1.The Director of Town and Country Planning, Office of the DTCP, No.207, Anna Salai, Chennai.

2.The District Collector, Dindigul District,

3.The Member Secretary, Dindigul Local Planning Authority,

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. ta

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer,

5.The Assistant Director, Geology and Mining, District Collectorate,

6.The Tahsildhar,

07.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH R.S.Kannan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director of Town and Country Planning, Office of the DTCP, No.207, Anna Salai, Chennai. 2.The District Collector, Dindigul District, 3.The Member Secretary, Dindigul Local Planning Authority, 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, 5.The Assistant Director, Geology and Mining, District Collectorate, 6.The Tahsildhar, 7.The President, Palaganoothu Village, Puthuchathiram Panchayat, ...Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents No.1, 3, 7 from granting any planning approval or building permission for any construction / development of any building structure or within 300 meters from the quarrying site in Survey Nos.11/4D (part), 13/2C, Palaganoothu Village, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District and consequently direct the respondents to prevent any illegal construction being made within the said safety distance in the light of Rule 36 (1-A) of the Tamil Nadu Minor Minerals Consession Rules 1959 and the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 14.06.2019. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Selvanayagam For R1 to R6 : Mr.S.Jeyapriya Government Advocate For R7 : Mr.P.Subbaraj

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.