VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

V.Venugopal v. The Prl. Account General

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 October 2023
Bench
S.M. Subramaniamauthor, V. Lakshminarayanan
Case no.
WP(MD) 16706/2020

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.) The writ petitioner, Mr.V.Venugopal, during the lifetime of his first wife, deceased employee Smt.Sivakali contracted second marriage with one Smt.Devika, D/o.Natarajan. Hence, even during the lifetime of the deceased Government employee, her husband Venugopal contracted second marriage and therefore, as per the Pension Rules, Mr.V.Venugopal is not entitled to receive family pension under Rule 49(6). Thus, while clarifying the procedures for nominating the spouse for the purpose of grant of family pension in W.P.(MD).No.23181 of 2019, we made it clear that Mr.V.Venugopal, writ petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.16706 of 2020, is not eligible for family pension under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

¶2Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

(S.M.S.,J.) (V.L.N.,J.)

17.10.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Lm To

1.The Principal Accountant General, Door No.361, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 018.

2.The District Social Welfare Officer, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Block Development Officer, Paramakudi Panchayat Union, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J. and V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J. Lm

17.10.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.10.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN V.Venugopal .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Principal Accountant General, Door No.361, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 018. 2.The District Social Welfare Officer, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Block Development Officer, Paramakudi Panchayat Union, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. 4.U.Ravi .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to disburse the death benefits, family pension and other service benefits of the deceased wife of the petitioner, Sivakali within a time frame that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Barathan For R-1 : Mr.P.Gunasekaran For R-2 & R-3 : Mr.S.Shanmugavel Additional Government Pleader For R-4 : Mr.R.Senthilkumar

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.