VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

R. Mary Stanly Rose Punitha, v. Prince Arockiyaraj,

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
31 March 2023
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
CONT P(MD) 1101/2022

Judgment

ORDER Alleging wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD).No.13970 of 2018 dated 22.12.2021, the Contempt Petition has been filed.

¶2When the Writ Petition was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submitted that the order of this Court in W.P.(MD).No.13970 of 2018 dated 22.12.2021 is complied with by proceedings dated 28.03.2023.

3.Recording the said submission, this Contempt Petition is closed.

31.03.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes Nsr To The District Educational Officer, Nagercoil – 629 001, Kanyakumari District. S.SRIMATHY, J

Nsr

31.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 31.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY In W.P.(MD).No.13970 of 2018 R.Mary Stanly Rose Punitha ... Petitioner/Petitioner Vs. Thiru.Prince Arockiyaraj, The District Educational Officer, Nagercoil – 629 001, Kanyakumari District. ... Contemnor/3rd Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to punish the contemnor for wilfully disobeying and not complying with the order of this Court, dated 22.12.2021, in W.P.(MD).No.13970 of 2018. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Ragatheesh Kumar, For M/s.Isaac Chambers For Respondent : Mr.V.Omprakash, Government Advocate.

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.