VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Sundararajan v. The Principal Secretary

WITHDRAWN DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
2 August 2023
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 16571/2022

Judgment

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

02.08.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No trp To

1.The Principal Secretary, Handlooms, Handicrafts, Textiles and Khadi Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (s) Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

3.The Deputy Director / Managing Director, The Bharathi Co-operative Spinning Mills Ltd., Vilathikulam Road, Ettayapuram – 628 902..

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.,

trp W.P(MD).No.16571 of 2022 and WMP(MD).No.11983 of 2022

02.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P(MD).No.16571 of 2022 and WMP(MD).No.11983 of 2022 Sundarrajan ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Principal Secretary, Handlooms, Handicrafts, Textiles and Khadi Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (s) Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 3.The Deputy Director / Managing Director, The Bharathi Co-operative Spinning Mills Ltd., Vilathikulam Road, Ettayapuram – 628 902.. ...Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus forebearing the 3rd respondent and their men, agents, servants or any other person claiming through them, from disengaging the petitioner from services and directing the 3rd respondent to extend the retirement age of the petitioner from 59 years to 60 years in the light of the G.O.Ms.No.29, dated 25.02.2021 issued by the 2nd respondent. For Petitioner : Ms.M. Nandhini For respondents : Mr. D.S. Neduncheliyan Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.