- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 July 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 15262/2023
Judgment
ORDER When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he also made an endorsement.
2.Recording the above submission and the endorsement of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is closed. No costs.
06.07.2023 dsk To
1.The District Revenue Officer, Karur.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk
06.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Achutharaman ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Revenue Officer, Karur. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District. 3.G.Laksshmi ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 2 to grant permission to the petitioner to conduct the temple festival of Sakkalamman Temple at Porunthalur Village, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District from 29.06.2023 to 04.07.2023. For petitioner : Mr.M.Prabhu For Respondent : Mr.G.Vairam Santhosh, Nos.1 & 2 Additional Government Pleader For Respondent : Mr.N.Shankar Ganesh No.3
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.