- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 1 June 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 16665/2022
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
¶2In my view this writ petition has been prematurely filed. What is under challenge is only an interdepartmental communication. As and when the impugned communication is enforced, the petitioner is always at liberty to question the same in the manner known to law. All the contentions of the petitioner are left open. This writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
01.06.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To
1.The District Educational Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.
2.The Block Educational Officer, Kalaiyarkoil, Sivagangai District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and W.M.P(MD)No.12093 of 2022
01.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)No.12093 of 2022 S.Santhi Sahaya Selvi ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Educational Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District. 2.The Block Educational Officer, Kalaiyarkoil, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the order passed by the second respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No. 1066/A2/2022 dated 27.06.2022, quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Paneer Selvam For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheeshkumar Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.