- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 3 August 2023
- Bench
- S Justice S.Srimathy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 16957/2020
Judgment
O R D E R When the writ petition was taken up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 submitted that the electric connection granted to the 3rd respondent was disconnected and the account was closed on 20.12.2020.
2.Therefore, the prayer sought in this writ petition is granted to the petitioner. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication and the writ petition is closed. No costs. Index : Yes / No
03.08.2023 Internet : Yes NCC : Yes / No Tmg S.SRIMATHY, J Tmg
03.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY A.Oyyammal ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Chief Engineer, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Racecourse Road, Madurai. 2.Additional Divisional Engineer, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Melur. 3.M.Ayyanar ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 08.09.2020 and to disconnect the electricity connection in Service No.116004516 issued for the alleged Agricultural use of land in survey no.6/3A punja land in Poonchuthi Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai District within the time frame that may be prescribed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.A.R.Sethupathy For R1 and 2 : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan *****
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.