K.Vijayakumar v. The Superintendent of Police

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondents No.2 and 3 not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry or investigation under the false, afterthought complaint given by the 4th respondent and desist from involving any kind of harassments and illegal activities towards the petitioner.

¶2The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the fourth respondent has lodged a complaint stating that there was sale agreement between himself and the petitioner. Thereafter, the sale deed was also executed for a sum of Rs.7,62,465/-, but only Rs.5,62,465-was paid and the remaining amount was not paid by the petitioner. On the basis of the above said complaint, enquiry was conducted. During the course of enquiry, the balance amount was paid to the fourth respondent, when he was admitted in hospital, that was also accepted by the fourth respondent, on the above said basis, the complaint was closed on

29.04.2023.

¶3Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, nothing survives for further consideration or direction in this matter.

¶4With the above said observation, this Criminal Original Petition stands closed.

28.06.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : Indu G.ILANGOVAN

,J.

Indu To

¶1The Superintendent of Police, D.P.O. K.Pudur, Madurai, District.

¶2The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Melur, Madurai District.

¶3The Inspector of Police, Melur Police Station, Madurai District.

¶4The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Dated: 28.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.06.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.11668 of 2023 K.Vijayakumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, D.P.O. K.Pudur, Madurai, District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Melur, Madurai District. 3. The Inspector of Police, Melur Police Station, Madurai District. 4. R.Kasi ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the respondents No.2 and 3 not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry or investigation under the false, afterthought complaint given by the 4th respondent and desist from involving any kind of harassments and illegal activities towards the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.Siva Ilayaraja S For R1 to R3 : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor for