Pavalakodi, v. Mrs.Sabitha

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2In normal circumstances, this Court would have condoned the delay and taken up the review application on merits. I am more than satisfied that the order passed by this Court does not suffer from any error apparent on the face of record. No purpose will be served in condoning the delay and directing the registry to number them.

¶3This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. Consequently, the review application stands rejected at SR stage itself. No costs.

12.07.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No NCC :Yes /No MGA C.M.P.(Mi)No.6927oofo2022 ino Rev.Aplc(Mi)SR.No.44426oofo2022 oG.R.SWAMINATHANoo,oJo. MGA C.M.P(MD)No.6927oofo2022 ino Rev.Aplc(MD)SR.No.44426oofo2022

12.07.2023

C.M.P.(MD)No.6927 of 2022 in Rev.Aplc(MD)SR.No.44426 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN C.M.P(MD)No.6927 of 2022 in Rev.Aplc(MD)SR.No.44426 of 2022 1.Pavalakodi 2.G.Prabavathi 3.M.Selvapandi ... Petitioners/ Petitioners Vs. 1.E.Sabitha 2.P.R.K.Pandian ... Respondents/ Respondents Prayer in C.M.P.(MD)No.6927 of 2022 : Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, pleased to condone the delay of 21 days in filing a review petition before this Court. Prayer in Rev.Aplc.(MD)SR No.44427 of 2022: Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Civil Procedure Code against the order passed in S.A(MD)No.885 of 2010, dated 06.04.2022. C.M.P.(MD)No.6927 of 2022 in Rev.Aplc(MD)SR.No.44426 of 2022 For Petitioners : Mr.M.Karuppasamy Pandian For Respondents : Mr.S.Anand Chandrasekar for Sarvabhauman Associates for R.1