VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

V.Gunasekaran v. The Joint Commissioner

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
8 June 2026
Bench
D.Bharatha Chakravarthyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 15219/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow D.Bharatha Chakravarthy

Judgment

ORDER The writ petition is filed for a mandamus directing the 1st respondent to take necessary action for confirming the draft scheme dated 29.01.2026 issued in O.A.No.40/2023 in respect of Arulmigu Achuwandi Parai Perumal Temple, Pambalupatti, Gujiliamparai Taluk, Koombur Village, Dindigul District on the basis of the petitioner representation dated 11.5.2026 and to pass such other further order or orders as this Honorable court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.

¶2Heard Mr.R.G.Shankar Ganesh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.S.Vashik Ali, learned Government Standing Counsel who takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that Framing of scheme, Rules published by G.O. (Ms.) No. 4851 dated

26.11.1960, as amended periodically are applicable for the purpose of framing the scheme. The time granted for any person to file objections to the draft scheme is only 60 days.

¶4In this case, the draft scheme was published as early as January, and the 60-day period for filing objections has also expired. Even thereafter, the respondents have not passed final orders in respect of the same.

¶5In view of the nature of the order passed, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage without notice to the private respondents. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

¶6When the draft scheme is said to have been published on

29.01.2026, it is for the 1st respondent to pass the final orders in accordance with the rules by considering the objections, if any, and by hearing all the parties concerned. The said exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible, in any event not later than four months from the date of receipt of the web copy of this order.

¶7With these directions and observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

08.06.2026 rgm To

¶1The Joint Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Dindugul.

¶2The Assistant Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Dindugul.

¶3The Thakkar/Executive Officer, Arulmigu Achuvandi Parai Perumal Temp Pambulipatti, Koombur Village, Gujiliamparai Taluk, Dindigul District having office at Arulmigu Seenivasa Perumal Temple, Malai Adiwaram, Dindugul District. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

, J.

rgm and W.M.P(MD)No.11396 of 2026

08.06.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 08.06.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P(MD)No.11396 of 2026 1. V.Gunasekaran 2. V.Jagadeesan ... Petitioners Vs. 1. The Joint Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Dindugul. 2. The Assistant Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Dindugul. 3. The Thakkar/Executive Officer, Arulmigu Achuvandi Parai Perumal Temp Pambulipatti, Koombur Village, Gujiliamparai Taluk, Dindigul District having office at Arulmigu Seenivasa Perumal Temple, Malai Adiwaram, Dindugul District. 4. Rajkumar 5. P.Balakrishnan ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to take necessary action for confirming the draft scheme dated 29.01.2026 issued in O.A.No.40/2023 in respect of Arulmigu Achuwandi Parai Perumal Temple, Pambalupatti, Gujiliamparai Taluk, Koombur Village, Dindigul District on the basis of the petitioner representation dated 11.5.2026 and to pass such other further order or orders as this Honorable court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice. For Petitioner : Mr.R.G.Shankar Ganesh For R1 and R2 : Mr.S.Vashik Ali Government Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.