VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Venkatesan, v. S.Solaiyammal

ORDERED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
13 February 2026
Bench
G.K. Ilanthiraiyanauthor
Case no.
WMP(MD) 22472/2025

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 13.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN WMP(MD). No.22472 of 2025 in WP(MD)No.17746 of 2024 & WP(MD)No.17746 of 2024

¶1Venkatesan,

¶2Seenivasan, ... Petitioners Vs.

¶1S.Solaiyammal,

¶2Shanmugam. MP,

¶3The District Registrar(A.I.G,), Virudhunagar District,Virudhunagar.

¶4The Sub Registrar,, Aruppukottai Sub Registrar Office, Virudhunagar District.. ... Respondents PRAYER :- To recall the order dated 28.11.2024 passed in W.P.(MD) No. 17746 of 2024 on the file of this Court. For Petitioners : Mr.P.M.Vishnu Varthanan,

For Respondents : No appearance W.P(MD)No.17746 of 2024

1.S.Solaiyammal

2.M.P.Shanmugam ... Petitioners Vs

1.The District Registrar (A.I.G), Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Sub Registrar, Aruppukottai Sub Registrar Office, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned refusal No.RFL/Aruppukottai/26/2024 of registration documents proceedings dated 19.07.2024 issued by the second respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the second respondent herein to register the said document presented by the petitioners with regard to the property of Plot Nos.97, 98, 99 an extent of 5651.5 sq.ft of land comprised in old Survey No.160/1C1A and New Survey No.160/54A situated in Palayampatti Village, Aruppukottai Sub Registrar Office, Virudhunagar District. For Petitioners : No appearance

For Respondents : No appearance COMMON ORDER This Petition is filed to recall the order passed by this Court dated

28.11.2024 passed in W.P.(MD) No.17746 of 2024 , thereby setting aside the refusal check slip dated 19.07.2024, passed by the fourth respondent herein and directed to represent the sale lead for registration and on receipt of the same, the second respondent is directed to register the sale deed and release the same forthwith.

¶2The petitioner claims to be the original owner of the subject property and pointed out that even in the refusal check slip which was impugned in the writ petition categorically mentioned that the subject property which was allegedly settled by the 1st respondent herein in favour of the second respondent herein, registered by document No. 3686 of 2016 was cancelled vide Document No. 5142/2017, on the complaint lodged by the petitioner. That apart, the current document was also cancelled by the cancellation deed registered vide document No. 3686/2016. Therefore, the first respondent has no title over the subject property to deal with the same. However, it was suppressed before this Court and an order was obtained by the respondents 1 and 2 herein.

¶3Though was notice served on the respondents 1 and 2 and name printed in the cause list, no one is appeared before this Court, either by person or through counsel.

¶4Therefore, this Court is inclined to recall the order passed by this court vide order dated 28.11.2024 passed in W.P.(MD) No.17746 of 2024 and accordingly, recalled and the writ petition itself is dismissed.

¶5In the result, this Writ Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.

13.02.2026 LS TO

¶1The District Registrar(A.I.G), Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

¶2The Sub Registrar, Aruppukottai Sub Registrar Office, Virudhunagar District. G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J LS

WMP(MD) No.22472 of 2025 in WP(MD)No.17746 of 2024

13.02.2026

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.