- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 7 July 2023
- Bench
- D.Nagarjun
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 12298/2023
Judgment
O R D E R This petition is filed seeking for quashment of F.I.R. In Crime No.30 of 2023 pending on the file of the first respondent.
¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the first respondent and learned counsel for the second respondent are present.
¶3When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that in the meanwhile, Police have completed the investigation and filed a charge sheet before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Nagercoil, against the petitioner on 30.06.2023 for the offence under Section 427 of I.P.C.
¶4Since the very purpose for which the petitioner's petition has already been defeated, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
07.07.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no tsg To
1.The Inspector of Police, Kanyakumari Police Station, Kanyakumari District.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
DR.D.NAGARJUN, J. tsg
07.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN and Crl.M.P.(MD).No.9635 of 2023 Ganesan ... Petitioner / Accused No.1 Vs 1.The State represented by the Inspector of Police, Kanyakumari Police Station, Kanyakumari District. (In Crime No.30 of 2023) ..1st Respondent / Defacto Complainant 2.Manikandan ..2nd Respondent / Defacto Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying, to call for the records in FIR in Crime No.30 of 2023 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same in respect of the petitioner is concerned. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Malaiyendran For R-1 : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor For R-2 : Ms.R.Shalini
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.