Sangili v. The District Collector

O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No.

15.09.2023 Internet:Yes am To

1.The District Collector, The District Collector's Office, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Ramanathapuram.

3.The Assistant Director, Mines and Minerals, Ramanathapuram.

4.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Ramanathapuram.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. am

15.09.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Sangili ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, The District Collector's Office, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Ramanathapuram. 3.The Assistant Director, Mines and Minerals, Ramanathapuram. 4.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Ramanathapuram. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.06.2022 and consequently direct the third respondent to permit the petitioner for taking filing sand at his own patta land situated in survey No.6/18B, with an extent of 0.65 hectors at Vennathoor Group, Devipattinam Village, Ramanathapuram DiDistrict. For Petitioner :Mr.V.Muthumani For Respondents :Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh Additional Government Pleader