Ptichaimuthu.S v. The District Collector

ORDER The petitioner has submitted an application for survey and with a grievance that the said application has not been considered, he has filed this writ petition.

2.When the matter came up for hearing today, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the survey has already been conducted and that nothing survives for further adjudication.

3.Recording the aforesaid submission, this writ petition stands closed. No costs. Index :

07.08.2023 NCC : Internet : gk To

1.The District Collector, District Collectorate, Trichy District.

2.The Tahsildar, Musuri Taluk, Trichy District.

3.The Taluk Surveyor, Musuri Taluk, Trichy District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk

07.08.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.Ptichaimuthu .. Petitioner v. 1.The District Collector, District Collectorate, Trichy District. 2.The Tahsildar, Musuri Taluk, Trichy District. 3.The Taluk Surveyor, Musuri Taluk, Trichy District. .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents, especially the third respondent, to survey the land in S.No.184/10 measuring 0-6.50 Ares in Thinnakonam Village, Musuri Taluk, Trichy District and fix the four boundary by considering the petitioner's application vide payment challan dated 19.06.2023, within a stipulated time limit. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Karthick For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader *****