- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 June 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 15561/2023
Judgment
O R D E R This writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry and initiate appropriate action against the 3rd and 4th respondent by considering the petitioner's complaint dated 29.11.2022.
¶2Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.
¶3The grievance of the petitioner is that even though the complaint was filed on 29.11.2022, so far no action has been taken. The second respondent is present before this Court and submitted that the whereabouts of the accused is not known for a long time and now only it has been stated that he is in Dubai. However, his address is not known to them.
4.Let the enquiry on the petitioner's complaint be completed by the second respondent within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Depending upon the outcome of the enquiry, further action shall be taken either by the competent authority or by the petitioner if so aggrieved.
5.With the above said directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.
30.06.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No TM To
1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.
2.The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch Madurai, Madurai City, Madurai.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN, J TM
Dated :30.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30.06.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Syed Mohammed Ibrahim ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch Madurai, Madurai City, Madurai. 3.Kalaivanan, 4.Vasuki ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry and initiate appropriate action against the 3rdadn 4th respondent by considering the petitioner's complaint dated 29.11.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vishnuvardhan For Respondents : Mr.B.Nambiselvan for R1 & R2 Additional Public Prosecutor
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.