- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 8 August 2023
- Bench
- P.Dhanabal
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 17241/2020
Judgment
ORDER When the matter is taken up for hearing today there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
¶2Already this case was posted under the caption 'For dismissal' and even on several hearings there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this Writ Petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.
08.08.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No aav To
¶1The Superintendent of Police Ramanathapuram
¶2The Deputy Superintendent of Police Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District
¶3The Inspector of Police Paramakudi Town Police Station, Paramakudi
¶4The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai
P.DHANABAL, J. aav
08.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :08.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL M. Naganathan ... Petitioner -Vs- 1. The Superintendent of Police Ramanathapuram 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District 3. The Inspector of Police Paramakudi Town Police Station, Paramakudi 4. V.Rani ... Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 not to evict the petitioner Auto Sangam in the name of Arulmigu Muthmariamman Auto Owners Association Paramakudi Ramanathapuram Dist. on the basis of the representation of the petitioner dated 20.11.2020. For Petitioner : No appearance For R1 to R3 : Mr. R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor For R4 : Mr.S.Bharathi
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.