Arumugam.P v. The Commissioner

O RDER

When the matter was listed for hearing on 08.11.2023, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner and hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal' today.

2.Even though this writ petition is listed under the caption 'for dismissal' today (i.e., 10.11.2023), there is no representation on the side of the the petitioner. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

10.11.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ta To

1.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai.

2.The Assistant Engineer, Madurai Corporation, Madurai.

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. ta

10.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH P.Arumugam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai. 2.The Assistant Engineer, Madurai Corporation, Madurai. 3.The Manager, Than Foundation, No.1a, Vaithyanathapuram East, Kenet Cross Road, Madurai 625016. ...Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents or their men or agent from disturbing my peaceful possession and enjoyment in Survey No.290 situates near Yadavar perumal Temple, Avaniyapuram, Madurai District. For Petitioner : No Appearance For R1 & R2 : Mr.K.Sivabalan Standing Counsel