- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 June 2023
- Bench
- G.K. Ilanthiraiyan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 11843/2023
Judgment
CRL OP(MD). No.11843 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 30/06/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD). No.11843 of 2023 Ashok Kumar, ... Petitioner/1st Accused
Vs The Inspector of Police, Thadikombu Police Station, Dindigul District. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.SURESH M, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.R.M.ANBUNITHI, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- To enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with the SC.No.276 of 2018 on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Court at Dindigul ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A1 herein was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 08.04.2023 for the alleged offence under Sections 120(B), 302 r/w.34 of IPC in Crime No.102 of 2013(S.C.No.276 of 2018 on the file of the Additional District Court, Dindigul) on the file of the respondent police seeks bail.
¶2Earlier the petitioner was arrested and released on bail. Thereafter the petitioner did not appear before the trial Court , hence Non Bailable Warrant was issued on 22.02.2023. The petitioner was arrested on execution of Non Bailable Warrant on 08.04.2023.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is regularly appearing before the trial Court on all hearing dates and due to his ill health he was unable to appear before the trial Court, due to which Non Bailable Warrant came to be issued and the petitioner was remanded to custody pursuant to the execution of Non Bailable Warrant on 08.04.2023 CRL OP(MD). No.11843 of 2023
¶4The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposing the bail petition would submit that the petitioner is absconding and with much difficulty the respondent police secured the petitioner. Further, if the petitioner is released on bail, he may abscond again.
5.Taking into consideration all the allegations made against the petitioner and also the fact that the petitioner was arrested on execution of Non bailable Warrant and also taking into consideration the period of incarceration, this Court inclined to grant bail to the petitioner by imposing conditions.
6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Dindigul
i) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity
ii) the petitioner shall report before the learned Additional District and Sessions Court, Dindigul on all working days at 10.30 a.m and 5.30 p.m., until further orders
iii)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness.
iv) the petitioner shall not abscond during trial.
v)On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
vi) If the petitioner/ accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC. sd/- 30/06/2023 / TRUE COPY / 30/06/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. CRLeOP(MD).eNo.11843eofe2023 AAV TO 1 THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DINDIGUL. 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THADIKOMBU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 3 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, DISTRICT PRISON, DINDIGUL. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11843 of 2023 Date :30/06/2023 SA/VR/SAR. /30.06.2023/3P/5C
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.