VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Jeyasingh v. The Authorized Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 June 2023
Bench
R. Subramanianauthor, S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
Case no.
WP(MD) 15570/2023

Judgment

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] In view of the fact that the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Madurai, is not manned, we are entertaining this writ petition.

¶2Mr.B.Rajesh Saravanan, learned counsel, takes notice for the respondent - Bank.

¶3With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is taken up for final hearing at the admission stage itself.

¶4The sale notice, dated 06.06.2023, issued by the respondent - Bank, is under challenge in this writ petition.

¶5Learned counsel for the respondent – Bank would submit that the sale that was to be held on 26.06.2023 could not be held, since there were no bidders.

¶6Learned counsel for the petitioner would, however, submit that the petitioner would be able to liquidate the debt, if sometime is given to him.

¶7Considering the said submission, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

(i) The respondent – Bank will not initiate any further proceedings for recovery, if the petitioner pays a sum of Rs.14,23,318/- (Rupees fourteen lakhs twenty three thousand three hundred and eighteen only) to the respondent – Bank, on or before 28.07.2023.

(ii) The balance amount of Rs.20,00,000/- (Rupees twenty lakhs only) shall be paid by the petitioner in two equated monthly installments. The first installment shall be paid on or before 28.08.2023 and the second installment shall be paid on or before 29.09.2023.

(iii) The interest payable for the interregnum period and the cost of the sale shall be paid along with the last installment.

(iv) If there is a default in payment as directed above, the respondent – Bank can proceed with the sale. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

[R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.]

28.06.2023

NCC : Index : Internet :

krk R.SUBRAMANIAN , J . and L.VICTORIA GOWRI , J . krk and W.M.P.(MD) No.13086 of 2023

28.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and W.M.P.(MD) No.13086 of 2023 Jeyasingh ... Petitioner -vs- The Authorized Officer Indian Bank Chenbagaramanpudur Branch Kanyakumari District ... Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the impugned notice of intended sale dated 06.06.2023 issued by the respondent bank and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Ezhilarasu For Respondent : Mr.B.Rajesh Saravanan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.