S.Rajalakshmi v. The Superintendent of Police

O RDER

This petition is filed seeking for a direction to the police not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry in respect of the complaint given by the respondent Nos. 3 to 5.

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there are financial transactions between the petitioner and the respondent Nos. 3 to 5, thereby false complaint has been given by the unofficial respondents.

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 on the other hand submits that on receipt of the complaint from the respondent Nos. 3 to 5, an enquiry was conducted in current paper bearing C.No.930/SP/GDP/PDK/23 dated 23.03.2023 and C.No. 238/DSP/DCB/PDK/23 dated 23.03.2023 and subsequently, the said petition was closed on 13.06.2023.

4.Since the complaint has already been closed by the respondent police, this Petition stands also closed.

Speaking : Yes / No

05.07.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No mm To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Pudukkottai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. DR.D.NAGARJUN. J. mm Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12119 of 2023

05.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN S.Rajalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai. 2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Pudukkottai District. 3.Kala @ Kalaiyarasi 4.Dhanalakshmi 5.Tamil Selvi ..Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry on the complaint of respondents 3 to 5. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Balaji For R1& R2 : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh Government Advocate (Crl.Side)