VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Pitchai v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
5 July 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 16126/2023

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner has approached this Court that the 5th respondent is attempting to lay a road in his patta land in Survey No.115/14B situated at Old Kannivadi Village, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶2The learned Additional Government Pleader, who took notice for the respondents 1 to 4, submits that there is a cart track and the respondents are attempting to lay a road only in the cart track.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner disputed the same stating that the cart track is in Survey No.115/3 and not in the petitioner's patta land in Survey No.115/14B.

¶3The learned Additional Government Pleader also submits that the 5th respondent/the Block Development Officer has paid necessary fee to identify the exact position with the Survey Department. The respondents have also considered the petitioner's objection and taken necessary steps to identify the place by measuring the land with the help of the Survey Department and the survey is likely to be conducted within a period one month.

¶4In view of the said submission, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to conduct a survey in the presence of the petitioner and proceed with after providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner. No costs.

05.07.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No.

To

¶1The District Collector,

¶2The District Revenue Officer,

¶3The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. Revenue Divisional Office, Dindigul.

¶4The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Dindigul West Taluk,

¶5The Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayat), Block Development Office, Reddiyar Chathiram Union,

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

05.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Pitchai ... Petitioner versus 1. The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2. The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. Revenue Divisional Office, Dindigul. 4. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Dindigul West Taluk, 5. The Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayat), Block Development Office, Reddiyar Chathiram Union, ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to forbear the respondents from laying road in S.F.No.115/14B at Old Kannivadi Village, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District, except following due process of law. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Maruthu Pandian For R1 to R4 : Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Government Pleader For R5 : Mr.S.Kameswaran, Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.