- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 24 November 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 17586/2020
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition. He has also filed a memo to that effect.
¶2In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
24.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No sm TO:-
1.The Collector, Collectrate, Tuticorin District.
2.The Special Thasildhar, Land Acquisition ( Adi-Dravida Welfare), Ettayapuram Road, Kovilpatti, Tuticorin District.
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. sm W.P.(MD)No.17586 of 2020 Dated:
24.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.(MD)No.17586 of 2020 R.Sankareswari ...Petitioner /Vs./ 1.The Superintending Engineer, (Distribution), Tangedco Ltd., Tuticorin, Tuticorin District. 2.Assistant Engineer ( Distribution), Town / South Division, Tangedco Ltd., Kovilpatti, Tuticorin District. 3.The Collector, Collectrate, Tuticorin District. 4.The Special Thasildhar, Land Acquisition ( Adi- Dravida Welfare), Ettayapuram Road, Kovilpatti, Tuticorin District. . ...Respondents PRAYER:- Petition - filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the Impugned Letter Dated 29/10/2020 vide Ka.No. Ou.mi.po/Vi/Na/therkku/Ko.patti /A.No. 790/2020 Dated 29/10/2020 issued by the 2nd Respondent and quash the same and thereby direct the 2nd Respondent to provide electric connection to the property of the petitioner situated at east Side of Plot No. 18, Survey No. 482/1 and 488/A2, Pandavarmangalam Village, Kovilpatti Taluk, Tuticorin District within a stipulated period. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Rajesh Saravanan For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan (R1 & R2) Mr.B.Saravanan (R3 & R4) Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.