A. Joesph Stanley Raja v. The State of Tamilnadu

Order. For Petitioner : Mr.R.S.Sivaram For Respondents : Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R When the matter came up for hearing on 01.12.2023, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. Even today (i.e., on 06.12.2023), there is no representation on the side of the petitioner.

¶2Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

06.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No RM To

1.The District Collector, Dindigul.

2.The District Revenue Officer Dindigul.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul.

4.The Tahsildar Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul District.

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. RM

06.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and W.M.P(MD)No.14612 of 2020 A.Joseph Stanley Raja ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by the District Collector, Dindigul. 2.The District Revenue Officer Dindigul. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul. 4.The Tahsildar Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul District. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records of the order of the fourth respondent in respect of his impugned order in Na.Ka.No.1371/2020/AA3 dated 27.07.2020 and quash the same and pleased to direct the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.03.2019 for assignment of land in Dindigul District, Dindigul East Taluk, Koovanuthu Village, S.F.No.809/1, 809/2 and 809/6 total extent Acre 4.50 cents as per Rule 15 sub clause (7) and (9) of Revenue Standing