VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Nagammal v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 November 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 14083/2022

Judgment

ORDER This petition has been filed seeking direction to the 1st respondent not to interfere in the civil dispute by harassing the petitioner under the guise of enquiry frequently.

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the third respondent, enquiry is undertaken in G3/4108825/2022. During the course of enquiry, both sides appeared and finding that in respect of the issues between the parties suit in O.S.No.129 of 2022 is pending before the District Munsif, Ambasamudram. They gave undertaking that they will abide by the judgment to be passed in the above said pending suit. On the basis of the above said undertaking, the complaint was closed. Therefore, nothing survives for further consideration in this case.

3.Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed as infructuous.

22.11.2023 Index : Internet : TM To

1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ambasamudram Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Ambasamudram Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN

,J.

TM

22.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.11.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Nagammal ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ambasamudram Police Station, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Ambasamudram Police Station, Tirunelveli District. 3.V.P.Rajasekar ...Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to pass an order directing the 1st respondent not to interfere in the civil dispute by harassing the petitioner under the guise of enquiry frequently. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jegadeesh Pandian For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.