- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 3 October 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- CONT P(MD) 1671/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard both sides.
¶2I am more than satisfied that Shri.R.Raja, jurisdictional RDO had conducted himself correctly and appropriately. The case of contempt is not made out.
¶3The contempt petition is closed.
03.10.2023 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No rmi To The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District. Cont. P(MD)No.1671 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.18306 of 2020
03.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
Cont. P(MD)No.1671 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Cont. P(MD)No.1671 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.18306 of 2020 C.Rajesh ... Petitioner Vs. R.Raja The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District. ... Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order dated 27.07.2022 passed in W.P.(MD)No.18306 of 2020 by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Santhana Raman For Respondents : Mr.M.Siddharthan Additional Government Pleader Cont. P(MD)No.1671 of 2023 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.