- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 4 July 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 12100/2023
Judgment
CRL OP(MD). No.12100 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 04/07/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN CRL OP(MD). No.12100 of 2023 Krishnakumar ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police, Pudukkottai Cyber Crime Police Station, Pudukkottai District. (Crime No.11 of 2023). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.Pandiyaraj, Advocate. For Respondent : B.Nambiselvan,
Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :-For Bail in Crime No.11 of 2023 on the file of the respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :-
The petitioner/ sole accused herein, who was arrested on
21.05.2023 for the alleged offence under Sections 354(C), 417, 469 of IPC r/w. Section 67 of IT Act, in Crime No.11 of 2023 on the file of the respondent Police, seek bail.
¶2The case of the prosecution is that the accused had uploaded the private video of the defacto complainant in the social media, when the same was asked by the defacto complainant, the petitioner gave elusive answer. Hence the complaint.
¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent person and he was falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.
4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the earlier bail application that was filed by this petitioner was dismissed in Crl.O.P(MD) No.10831 of 2023, dated 19.06.2023 on the CRL OP(MD). No.12100 of 2023 ground that the petitioner has committed a very serious and heinous offence as against the victim girl. Further he would submit that so far five witnesses have been examined and the mobile phone, through which, the videograph taken has been sent for chemical analysis.
¶5Considering the fact that there is no change of circumstances and serious allegation made against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, this petition deserves dismissal and accordingly dismissed. sd/- 04/07/2023 / TRUE COPY / /07/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. INDU TO 1 THE SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT JAI, PUDUKKOTTAI. 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUDUKOTTAI CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12100 of 2023 Date :04/07/2023 RS//SAR-(07.07.2023) 2P 4C
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.