VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Balamurugan. V v. Government of Tamilnadu

WITHDRAWN DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
8 November 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 16245/2023

Judgment

ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. He also made an endorsement to this effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

08.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To

1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Local Administration Department, Fort St.George, Tamil Nadu.

2.The Chairman, TANGEDCO, NPKKR Maligai, Electricity Avenue, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

3.The District Collector, Dindigul Collector Office,

4.The Executive Officer, Palayam Town – Panchayath, and W.M.P(MD)Nos.13517 & 15270 of 2023

08.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)Nos.13517 & 15270 of 2023 V.Balamurugan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State represented by The Principal Secretary to Government, Local Administration Department, Fort St.George, Tamil Nadu. 2.The TANGEDCO, Represented by its Chairman, NPKKR Maligai, Electricity Avenue, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 3.The District Collector, Dindigul Collector Office, 4.The Executive Officer, Palayam Town – Panchayath, 5.Solar Power Energy Private Limited, Represented by P.Sankar Ganesh, Senior Engineer, Guziliamparai, 6.Simens Gamesa Renewable Energy, Service Road, Redhills, Chennai. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents or competent authority to remove the Electric High transmission wires from the petitioner's agriculture land in Survey No. 844/1 at Palayam Village, based on petitioner's representation dated 15.05.2023 to the third respondent within the stipulated period as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arunnithy For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate for R.1, R.3 & R.4 Mr.S.Dheenadhayalan Standing Counsel for R.2 No Appearance for R.6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.