VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Antony Micheal Rajan v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
16 August 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL MP(MD) 9575/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of August Two Thousand and Twenty Three PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN IN CRL OP(MD) No.8616 of 2023 ANTONY MICHEAL RAJAN ... PETITIONER/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT

Vs 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANJUGRAMAM POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.80 OF 2023. ...1ST RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT 2 SAHAYA EDWARD RAJAN @ EDWERD RAJAN(ANANTHAN)

...2ND RESPONDENT/PETITIONER Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to cancel the order of bail granted in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8616 of 2023 dated 02.06.2023 on the fie of this Honble Court and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in this circumstances of the case. Order : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.RAMESH RAJA P T, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.S.MANIKANDAN, Government Advocate (crl.side) on behalf of the 1st Respondent and MR.G.ARAVINDAN, Advocate for the Respondent No.2, the court made the following order:- A report has been called for from the trial Court as to the date of the filing of the alteration report. The said report is received stating that the alteration report was received on 02.08.2023. Before that date, Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8616 of 2023 was entertained by this Court, on the ground that the offences under Section 324 of IPC is mentioned.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he suffered grievous injuries and he was in the bed for about 27 days. It is also submitted that he underwent three surgeries but those things was not taken into account. However, subsequent to passing of the order, alteration report has been passed.

¶3The respondent police has made a spot visit and stated that he recovered fully from the injuries and he is also attending his usual routine work also.

¶4It is seen that final report has been filed on 08.08.2023 but not taken on file by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Madurai.

¶5Learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Madurai, is directed to process the final report and to take cognizance as per rules.

¶6I find no reason to cancel the bail at this stage. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.

sd/-

16/08/2023

/ TRUE COPY /

/08/2023

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023. pnn TO

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III, MADURAI. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANJUGRAMAM POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN IN CRL OP(MD) No.8616 of 2023 Date :16/08/2023

RK/BUC (22/08/2023) 4P / 5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.