VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Vanadevi v. The Sub Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
13 July 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 12050/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 13/07/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN

1.Vanadevi

2.Malaisamy

... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 Vs The State rep by The Sub Inspector of Police, Uthappanaikanur Police Station, Madurai. (Crime No.124 of 2023.) ... Respondent / Complainant For Petitioners : M/s.G.Thalaimutharasu, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.S.Manikandan,

Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.124 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 21(1), 21(5) of MMDR Act 1957 read with 379 of IPC and 3(3) TNPPL Act, in Crime No.124 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that on 26.06.2023 the accused persons were illegally quarrying sand from the land in surveyNo.28/5, 28/6 and 28/7B and transported in their vehicles, without valid permit and license. Hence, the complaint.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted it appears that one Veerathevan was making declaration that he got permission for mining in the patta land. On that account, the petitioners appear to have taken the sand. They are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the investigation is underway in which the Veerathevar has also been enquired.

¶5In view of the fact the petitioner is not directly involved in the act, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner alone.

¶6Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Usilampatti, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the second petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶7The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed The petitioner is directed to co-operate with the enquiry before the respondent, by producing documents, if any, in support of their contention.

sd/-

13/07/2023

/ TRUE COPY /

/07/2023

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023. PNN To

1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Usilampatti.

2.Do through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai District.

3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Uthappanaikanur Police Station, Madurai.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 CC to M/s.G.THALAIMUTHARASU, Advocate ( SR-10769[I] dated 14/07/2023 )

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.12050 of 2023

Date :13/07/2023 ED/MMS/SAR- (19/07/2023) 4P / 6C Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.