VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Karthika v. The Superintendent of Police

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
4 July 2023
Bench
M.S. Rameshauthor, M. Nirmal Kumar
Case no.
HCP(MD) 776/2023

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH,J.) The present petition is filed for issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus to produce the person or body of the detenu, who is the husband of the petitioner herein, from the illegal custody of the third respondent herein.

¶2The petitioner had also given a complaint to the second respondent Police, which has been registered in Crime No.134 of 2023 as "man missing".

¶3The detenu has been secured and he has now been produced before this Court by the second respondent Police.

¶4The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the detenu herein was not with the third respondent and that the third respondent has no connection to the case at all. Even otherwise, he would submit that the securing of the detenu has also been informed to the petitioner yesterday.

¶5In view of the above, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands disposed of.

(M.S.R.,J.) (M.N.K.,J.)

04.07.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Lm To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Ammayanaickanur Police Station, Dindigul District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

M.S.RAMESH,J. and M.NIRMAL KUMAR,J. Lm

H.C.P.(MD)No.776 of 2023

04.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.07.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR H.C.P.(MD)No.776 of 2023 Karthika .. Petitioner /Wife of the Detenu Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Inspector of Police, Ammayanaickanur Police Station, Dindigul District. 3.Jeslien Reeta .. Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body or person of the detenu namely Dharma, Son of Nedunjezhian, the husband of the petitioner, aged 25 years before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.C.T.Perumal For R-1 and R-2 : Mr.R.M.S.Sethuraman Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.