Rajapandi v. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District

ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to forbear the 2nd and 3rd respondents from interfering in civil dispute in respect of the petitioner's land and thatched house in Natham S.No.399/19, admeasuring 0.42.67 Hec, Naduvakurichi Village, Barkitmanagaram, Tirunelveli District, based on his representation dated 26.04.2026.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the fourth respondent is holding a post equivalent to that of an Additional Secretary in the Government and, by allegedly misusing his official position and influence, is continuously interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property. It was further submitted that the second respondent is acting in collusion with the fourth respondent and they are continuously threatening and harassing the petitioner. Aggrieved by the said acts and apprehending further interference, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking appropriate relief.

¶3The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent police submitted that, on receipt of a complaint from the fourth respondent, an enquiry was duly conducted in connection with the complaint lodged by the petitioner. Upon assessing the possibility of a law and order issue arising between the parties, the matter was referred to the Revenue Divisional Officer and assigned L.I.R. No.96 of 2026. It was further submitted that the proceedings are presently pending before the Revenue Divisional Officer for appropriate action.

¶4Heard the learned counsel on either sides and carefully perused the materials placed before this Court. Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed in this petition, notice to the 4th respondent is dispensed with.

¶5From the arguments made by either parties, it is seen that the 4th respondent is an influential government official, who is able to manipulate the civil dispute by giving a criminal colour. In view of the same, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirunelveli, is suo motu impleaded as the 5th respondent, for whom, Ms. M.R.Priyanka Jothi, Government Advocate takes notice.

¶6The fifth respondent is directed to conclude the enquiry initiated on the request made by the 3rd respondent police as expeditiously as possible, after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the 4th respondent, preferably, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that, insofar as the civil dispute between the parties is concerned, the respondent police shall not interfere except to the extent necessary for maintaining law and order.

¶7With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

11.06.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No sm TO:-

¶1The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District Police, Tirunelveli.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli Taluk Police Station, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli.

¶3The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli District.

¶4The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. Sm Dated

11.06.2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.06.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI & W.M.P.Crl.(MD)No.751 of 2026 Rajapandi ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District Police, Tirunelveli. 2. The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli Taluk Police Station, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli. 3. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli District. 4. Thangappa 5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruneveli. ... Respondents (R5 is suo motu impleaded vide order of this Court dated 11.06.2026 in this petition.) PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing in the nature of writ forbearing the 2nd and 3rd respondents from interfering in civil dispute which is relating to the petitioner's land and thatched house in Natham S.No.399/19, admeasuring 0.42.67 Hec, Naduvakurichi Village, Barkitmanagaram, Tirunelveli District based on his representation dated 26.04.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Selvan For Respondents : Mr.S.Arun Arockiasamy (R1 to R3) Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) Ms.M.R.Priyanka Jothi (R5) Government Advocate