VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Kalaiselvi, v. Petchiammal (Died) Seeni (Died) Periyakaruppan (Died) 1.Bhahaathal

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
16 March 2023
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
SA(MD) 532/2022

Judgment

JUDGMENT Since the appellant has filed a suit only for bare injunction, the Courts below by their concurrent findings have held that the suit is not maintainable as the appellant ought to have filed a suit for declaration. Admittedly, there is a cloud over the title of the suit schedule property, as seen from the defence raised by the defendants in their written statement. Therefore, necessarily the appellant/plaintiff ought to have filed a suit for declaration.

¶2The learned counsel for the appellant would now submit that liberty may be granted to the appellant/plaintiff to file a suit for declaration. He has also made an endorsement in the Court bundle seeking such liberty.

¶3The said endorsement is recorded by this Court. No prejudice would be caused to either of the parties, if such a relief is granted. In view of the fact that the suit has been dismissed on the ground that the plaintiff has not filed a suit for declaration, this second appeal is disposed of by granting liberty as prayed for by the appellant. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

16.03.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Rmk To

1.The District Munsif, Thirumangalam.

2.The Subordinate Judge, Thirumangalam. ABDUL QUDDHOSE.J., Rmk

16.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and C.M.P(MD).Nos.7216 and 7217 of 2022 Kalaiselvi ... Appellant/Appellant/Plaintiff Vs. Petchiammal (died) Seeni (died) 1.Bhahaathal 2.Karpuram 3.Velammal 4.Sakkammal 5.Backiyam 6.Narayanan 7.Ramar 8.Sakthivel 9.Mahalingam ... Respondents/Respondents/LRs of the defendants Prayer: Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to call for the records relating to the judgment and decree dated 11.07.2022 passed in A.S.No.37 of 2018 by the Subordinate Judge, Tirumangalam confirming the judgment and decree dated 12.03.2018 passed in O.S.No.204 of 2010 by the District Munsif Court, Tirumangalam and set aside the same. For Appellant : Mr.D.Malaichamy

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.