VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Vincent Boni Pace I v. The Chairman

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 July 2023
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 16275/2023

Judgment

ORDER The present writ petition is for a Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 and 4 to disburse the benefits of Encashment of Earned Leave and Encashment of Unearned Leave, General Provident Fund, Special Provident Fund, Family Benefit Fund on private affairs to the petitioner in the light of the orders passed in W.P.No 139 of 2016, dated 22.08.2017 and W.A.No.207 of 2016, dated

26.02.2016 (Chairman TNEB -vs-P.K. Panchaksharam) and in W.A.No.2767 of 2018 dated 17.12.2018 (The Superintending Engineer TNEB -vs– T.Datchinamurthy).

¶2By consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

¶3M/s.M.Parameswari, learned Standing Counsel for TANGEDCO brought to the notice of this Court that, the Secretary of TANGEDCO is a competent party to consider the crux of this case and hence this Court is inclined to suo motu implead the Secretary of TANGEDCO as fifth respondent.

¶4Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents and carefully perused the materials available on record.

¶5Considering the limited prayer sought for by the petitioner in this writ petition, this Court is inclined to direct the suo motu impleladed fifth respondent to disburse the benefits of Encashment of Earned Leave and Encashment of Unearned Leave, General Provident Fund, Special Provident Fund, Family Benefit Fund on private affairs to the petitioner in the light of the orders passed in W.P.No.139 of 2016, dated 22.08.2017, W.A.No.207 of 2016, dated 26.02.2016 and W.A.No.2767 of 2018, dated 17.12.2018 within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, considering the representation of the petitioner, dated 26.01.2023.

¶6With the above said observation, this writ petition stands allowed. There shall be no order as to costs.

06.07.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No BTR Note: Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendments in the cause-tilte. To

1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.144, Anna Salai, N.P.K.R.R. Maligai,

2.The Chief Engineer (Personal), TNEB/TANGEDCO, No.144, Anna Salai, N.P.K.R.R. Maligai,

3.The Chief Engineer, Distribution, TNEB/TANGEDCO, Thennur, Trichy District-17.

4.The Superintending Engineer, Trichy Electricity Distribution Circle, Metro Trichy, Mannarpuram, TANGEDCO, Trichy District-20.

5.The Secretary, TANGEDCO, 144, Anna Salai, N.P.K.R.R. Maaligai,

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

BTR

06.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI I.Vincent Boni Pace ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.144, Anna Salai, N.P.K.R.R. Maligai, 2.The Chief Engineer (Personal), TNEB/TANGEDCO, No.144, Anna Salai, N.P.K.R.R. Maligai, 3.The Chief Engineer, Distribution, TNEB/TANGEDCO, Thennur, Trichy District-17. 4.The Superintending Engineer, Trichy Electricity Distribution Circle, Metro Trichy, Mannarpuram, TANGEDCO, Trichy District-20. 5.The Secretary, TANGEDCO, 144, Anna Salai, N.P.K.R.R. Maaligai, ... Respondents (Suo motu impleaded as per order, dated 06.07.2023, in W.P(MD)No.16275 of 2023) Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 and 4 to disburse the benefits of Encashment of Earned Leave and Encashment of Unearned Leave, General Provident Fund, Special Provident Fund, Family Benefit Fund on private affairs to the petitioner in light of the order in W.P.No 139 of 2016, dated 22.08.2017 and W.A.No.207 of 2016, dated 26.02.2016 (Chairman TNEB -vs- P.K. Panchaksharam) and in W.A.No.2767 of 2018 dated 17.12.2018 (The Superintending Engineer TNEB -vs– T.Datchinamurthy). For Petitioner : Mr.I.Pinaygash For Respondents : M/s.M.Parameswari Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.