- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 4 August 2023
- Bench
- S Justice S.Srimathy
- Case no.
- CONT P(MD) 1333/2023
Judgment
O R D E R The petitioner challenged the transfer order wherein the petitioner was transferred from Nagercoil to Nagapattinam. This Court directed the respondent to transfer the petitioner to a nearby place in and around Nagercoil.
2.The respondent submitted that they have transferred the petitioner to Tirunelveli region. The petitioner is directed to join the service in Tirunelveli region forthwith.
3.The respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's case and accommodate him in Nagercoil region as and when the vacancy arises. Hence, the contempt petition is closed. No costs. Index : Yes / No
04.08.2023 Internet : Yes Tmg S.SRIMATHY, J
Tmg
04.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY M.Siva Makesh ... Petitioner vs. L.Shamala, The Senior Deputy Manager (HRD), State Express Transport Corporation Tamilnadu Limited, Pallavansalai, Chennai-2. ... Contemnor/Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for wilfully disobeying and not complying with the order of this Court, dated 25.01.2023, in W.M.P.(MD)No.1440 of 2023 in W.P. (MD)No.1574 of 2023. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Sivasudhan For Contemnor : Mr.K.Senthil Kumar *****
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.