VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

P.Pandi v. The Inspector of Police

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
13 July 2023
Bench
D.Nagarjunauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 12636/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN P.Pandi

... Petitioner Vs.

1.The State represented by Its Inspector of Police, B1, Melur Police Station, Madurai District (In Crime No.148 of 2007)

¶2The Deputy Collector/District Manager, Tamilnadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., (TASMAC), Madurai District ... Respondents 1 and 2/Complainants

3.S.Thirumalaisamy ... 3rd Respondent/Defacto complainant

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the entire records in C.C.No.259 of 2007 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Melur and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Raja Mohamed

For R1 & R2 : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking a direction to quash C.C.No.259 of 2007 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Melur.

¶2It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that on the basis of a complaint given by the defacto complainant, case has been registered against the petitioner and other accused in Crime No.148 of 2007 on the file of the first respondent police. After completion of investigation, charge sheet is filed against them for the offences punishable under Sections 408, 468, 471 and 477A IPC and the same is taken on file as C.C.No.259 of 2007 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Melur.

¶3It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner, who is stated to have misappropriated the amount, has given back the entire amount to the respondent No.2 on believing the assurance given by the respondent No.2 that he will reinstate the petitioner back in service. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that compromise has been entered into between the petitioner and the defacto complainant.

¶4On the other hand, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the entire trial was completed and arguments were also over and the trial court has also posted the matter for judgment on 20.12.2021.

¶5It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that on account of transfer of the concerned Judicial Magistrate, C.C.No.259 of 2007 is again posted for arguments.

¶5Considering the fact that the matter is ripe for the judgment, this Court directs the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Melur, to dispose of C.C.No.259 of 2007 within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶6With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Index : Yes/No

13.07.2023 Internet : Yes/No CM Note: Issue order copy on 14.07.2023. To,

¶1The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch-II, Madurai City, Mounted police (Kuthiraipadai), Residential Campus, Opp-Bharathi Store, Viswanathapuram, Madurai – 14.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. DR.D.NAGARJUN. J.

CM

13.07.2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.