- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 12 September 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 16468/2023
Judgment
O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No.
12.09.2023 Internet:Yes am
B.PUGALENDHI, J. am
12.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P(MD)No.13754 of 2023 N.Navaneethakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Regional Manager, Reserve Bank of India, Regional Office, No.16, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001. 2.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd., Through its Authorized Officer, Dare House, 2, N.S.C.Bose Road, Parrys, Chennai-600 001. 3.The Branch Manager, Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd., V.K.Velsamy Chinnammal Kalyanamandapam (Opposite Road), CSB Bank Upstairs, Theni-625 531. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to take action against the second and third respondents for their illegal seizer of petitioner car bearing registration No.TN-05- BP-6233 by considering his representation, dated 03.07.2023. For Petitioner :Mr.K.Sudalaiyandi For R3 :Mr.B.Janarth Kumar
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.