VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Saravanan v. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Awps-Marthandam

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 June 2026
Bench
R.Vijayakumarauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 10947/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow R.Vijayakumar

Judgment

ORDER The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the sole accused in Spl.S.C.No.81 of 2019 on the file of the learned Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District, seeking to quash the charge sheet wherein the petitioner is charged with the offence under Sections 342 of IPC (under Section 127 of B.N.S) and Section 5(1), 6, 11(5), 12 of the POCSO Act, 2012.

¶2The date of birth of the victim girl is 11.02.2007. The occurrence is said to have taken place on 11.03.2019.

¶3It is reflected in the charge sheet that the sole accused and the defacto complainant were in love with each other. However, the sexual assault had taken place without her consent. In the Section 164 statement also, the defacto complainant has stated that without her consent the sexual relationship has taken place.

¶3The victim girl had attained majority on 11.02.2025 and thereafter, she had got married to another person. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that the sole accused is also now married to a different lady. In such circumstances, both of them have entered into a joint compromise seeking to quash the present charge sheet.

¶4The victim/defacto complainant is present before this Court along with the child and she submits that she is married to a third party and therefore she does not want to prosecute the present case. She further submits that she had voluntarily agreed for quashing of the charge sheet.

¶5This Court is of the considered opinion that the sole accused as well as the defacto complainant have entered into relationship, who are originally in love with each other, had fallen apart due to difference in caste and they have chosen to marry two different persons. Now they want to lead their own life and they do not want to continue with the present prosecution.

¶6Considering the marital life of both the parties, especially the victim girl who had chosen to marry a third party and she has begotten a child, this Court is of the considered opinion that continuation of the cirminal proceedings would be a harassment to both the parties.

¶7In view of the above said facts, the charge sheet in Spl.S.C.No.81 of 2019 on the file of the learned Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District, is hereby quashed.

¶8Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of the order.

12.06.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi To

¶1The Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District

¶2The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Marthandam, Kanyakumari District.

¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J. ebsi Crl.O.P(MD)No.10947 of 2026

12.06.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.06.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.O.P(MD)No.10947 of 2026 Saravanan ... Petitioner/ Sole Accused Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Marthandam, Kanyakumari District. (Crime No.6 of 2019) ... 1st Respondent/ Complainant 2.xxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx Kanyakumari District ... 2nd Respondent/ Defacto Complainant 3. Manimegalai ... 3rd Respondent/ Mother of the Victim PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to call for the records in Spl.S.C.No.81 of 2019 before the learned Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District and to quash the same as against the petitioner and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Balaji Rajaram For R1 : Mr.B.Arum Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 & R3 : Mr.S.Arul

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.