VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Shanmugam v. The Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 July 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 12415/2023

Judgment

CRL OP(MD). No.12415 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 07/07/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN CRL OP(MD). No.12415 of 2023

¶1Shanmugam

¶2Murugesan ... Petitioners/Accused 5 & 6 Vs The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Annavasal Police Station, Pudukottai District. Crime No.81/2023. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : M/s. MOHAMED YEARSHAD.S, For Respondent : Mr.B.NAMBISELVAN,

Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.81/2023 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused herein, who were arrested on

19.04.2023 for the alleged offence under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 341, 427, 302, 506(2) of IPC, in Crime No.81 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seek bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the brother of the defacto complainant was brutally assaulted and murdered by the accused persons on 16.04.2023, at 02.30 p.m. Hence the complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they were falsely implicated in this case, based on the confession of co-accused. They have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Except the petitioners, all other accused have already been enlarged on bail. They are in custody from 19.04.2023. Hence, prays to enlarge them on bail.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the accused persons had brutally attacked and murdered the defacto complainant. The overt act attributed against the petitioner is CRL OP(MD). No.12415 of 2023 that he assaulted the deceased with Aruval. Hence, prays to dismiss the petition.

5.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court.

6.Perusal of records show that in this case, except the petitioners, all other co-accused have already been enlarged on bail. The co-accused namely, A2 who had also assaulted the deceased with knife has been granted bail by order of this Court and the petitioner is also standing on the same footing. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the period of incarceration already undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

7.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Illuppur, Pudukottai District, and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. sd/- 07/07/2023 / TRUE COPY / 07/07/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. PNM TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ILLUPUR, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. 3 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, DISTRICT JAIL, PUDUKKOTTAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANNAVASAL POLICE STATION, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT. 5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12415 of 2023 Date :07/07/2023 SA/SAR. /07.07.2023/2P/6C

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.