VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Marshal @ Arumugam Marshal v. The Inspector of Police

ORDERED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
11 July 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL MP(MD) 9856/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Eighteenth day of August Two Thousand and Twenty Three PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN IN CRL OP(MD) No.10001 of 2023 MARSHAL @ ARUMUGAM MARSHAL ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER

Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MUSIRI, TRICHY DISTRICT. CRIME NO.28 OF 2021. ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to grant extension of time granted in the order made in Crl.OP.(MD).No.10001 of 2023 dt.8.6.2023 on the file of this Honble Court. Order : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.ARUNRAJ.K, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.R.SURESH KUMAR, Government Advocate (Crl.side) on behalf of the Respondent and MR.P.M.VISHNUVARTHANAN, Advocate for the Intervenor, the court made the following order:- This petition has been filed to extend the time limit to comply with the condition prescribed in the order in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.10001 of 2023 on 08.06.2023.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to produce sureties, since the petitioner is unable to execute sureties within the stipulated time prescribed by this Court.

¶3The learned counsel for the defacto complainant would submit that even after granting the above said anticipatory bail to the petitioner, he is making trouble to the defacto complainant.

¶4Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the defacto complainant, if it is so, let the defacto complainant file a fresh complaint against the petitioner before the competent Police Officer.

¶5In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, time granted by this Court vide order in Crl.O.P(MD) No.10001 of 2023 is extended further for a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

sd/-

18/08/2023

/ TRUE COPY /

/08/2023

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023. indu To

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Thottiyam.

2.Do through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Trichy District.

3.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Musiri, Trichy District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 CC to M/s.K.ARUNRAJ, Advocate ( SR-12491[I] dated 18/08/2023 ) +1 CC to M/s.P.M.VISHNU VARTHANAN, Advocate ( SR-12507[I] dated 18/08/2023 ) ORDER IN IN CRL OP(MD) No.10001 of 2023 Date :18/08/2023

RK (28/08/2023) 3P / 7C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.