VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

T. Arul Sivakumar v. The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
29 January 2026
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 11107/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow S Justice L.Victoria Gowri

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking police protection to the petitioner's life and limb based on his representation dated

17.06.2025.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he is the de facto complainant who had given a complaint against the third respondent herein, who has trespassed into his property and had caused a threat to his life and limb for which he had given a representation on

17.06.2025. However, the second respondent police has failed to consider his representation. Therefore, he sought for indulgence of this Court.

¶3The learned Government Advocate submitted that the subject property which is comprised in survey No.198/8 at Pothampatti Village, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District is the ancestral property of the petitioner as well as the third respondent and the same has been declared in favour of the petitioner in a civil suit filed by the petitioner in O.S.No. 39 of 2022 on the file of the learned District Munsif / Judicial Magistrate No.I, Usilampatti and the same was decreed in favour of the petitioner. Against which an appeal was preferred by the 3rd responder in A.S.No.7 of 2025 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Usilampatti which was dismissed against which a Second Appeal in S.A.(MD)No.595 of 2025 was filed by the petitioner before this Court. In the Second Appeal, no injunction order has been passed. However, pending the Second Appeal, the petitioner has given a representation to the second respondent seeking police protection.

¶4Heard both sides and carefully perused the materials available on record.

¶5It is seen from the above submissions that a civil dispute is pending between the petitioner and the third respondent. Therefore, this Court do not find any merits on the petitioner's representation seeking police protection in the matter and the petitioner is directed to wait till a final decision is taken in S.A.(MD)No.595 of 2025.

¶6With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

29.01.2026 NCC : yes / no Index : yes / no Internet : yes / no pnn

To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Usilampatti Town Police Station, Usilampatti, Madurai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooL.oVICTORIAoGOWRI,oJ ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooopnn oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooORDER oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooIN oooooooooooooooooooooooooCRLoOP(MD)oNo.11107oofo2025 ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooDateoo:o29/01/2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 29/01/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI T. Arul Sivakumar ... Petitioner Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu Rep. By, the Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. 2. The Inspector of Police, Usilampatti Town Police Station, Usilampatti, Madurai District.. 3. Ramar ... Respondents PRAYER :- To Direct the respondents no. 1 and 2 to give necessary Police Protection to the petitioner's life and limb based on his representation dated 17.06.2025. For Petitioner : M/s. Sheik Abdulla.A., Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar for R1 Government Advocate (Crl.Side) Mr.M.A.M.Raja for R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.