Thangaraj v. L.J.Ganesan

JUDGMENT When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a Memo along with the signature of the appellant for not pressing the appeal. The same is recorded and further the learned counsel for the appellant has also made an endorsement in the bundle to that effect.

¶2In the result, this Second Appeal stands dismissed as not pressed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. The Registry is directed to refund the Court fee, according to law.

26.09.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No

Internet : Yes / No ebsi To

1.The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur.

¶2The Subordinate Judge, Virudhunagar. C.KUMARAPPAN,J. ebsi S.A.(MD)No. 186 of 2020

26.09.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN S.A.(MD)No.186 of 2020 and C.M.P(MD) No.2622 of 2020 Thangaraj ... Appellant/4th Respondent/ 4th Respondent/Auction Purchaser -vs- 1. L.J. Ganesan ... 1st Respondent/Appellant/ Petitioner-Claimant 2. Maheswari ... 2nd Respondent/1st Respondent/ 1st Respondent-Decree Holder 3. Jeyapandi ... 3rd Respondent/2nd Respondent/ 2nd Respondent-Judgment Debtor 4. Mahalakshmi ... 4th Respondent/3rd Respondent/ 3rd Respondent-Judgment Debtor PRAYER: Second Appeal is filed under Order 21 Rule 58(1) r/w Section 100 of C.P.C, against the judgment and decree dated 27.03.2019 passed in A.S.No. 55 of 2015 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur reversing the order passed in E.A.No.22 of 2012 in E.P.No.76 of 2007 in O.S.No.1 of 2007 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Virudhunagar, dated 05.09.2014, which is liable to be set aside. For Appellant : M/s.P.Malini For Respondents : Mr.K.Seenu Ramachandran – for R1 : Mrs.R.Meenakumari – for R2 : No appearance – for R3 and R4