- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 2 August 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 16535/2023
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has circulated a letter dated 31.07.2023 to the Registrar (Judicial) for withdrawing this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2Based on the letter dated 31.07.2023, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
02.08.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To
¶1The District Collector, Theni District.
¶2The Tahsildar, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy
02.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)No.13822 of 2023 V.Dhanuskodi ... Petitioner versus 1. The District Collector, Theni District. 2. The Tahsildar, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the Impugned Order in Na.Ka.No. 3149/2023/A9 dated 14.06.2023 on the file of the respondent No.2 and quash the same as illegal and consequently for a direction, directing the respondents to give the separate patta in Survey Nos.598/3 and 598/4B for 1.5 acre in the name of the petitioner within the time frame stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Prasanth For Respondents : Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.