- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 12 July 2023
- Bench
- S Justice S.Srimathy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 16690/2023
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking Writ of Mandamus to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 17.06.2002, for extending the present administrative committee of the said Darga and Pallivasal
¶2Heard the learned counsel on either side. With their consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
¶3Without going into the merits of the case, the 1st respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 17.06.2022 and pass an order in accordance with law. If there is any rival claimant, notice shall be issued to the rival claimant as well and thereafter, pass an order.
¶4With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition is allowed. No Costs.
12.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ksa To
1.The Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jafar Sirank Street, Valla Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai – 600 002.
¶2The Superintendent, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.12, Kilothar Street, Trichy.
¶3The Inspector, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Trichy.
S.SRIMATHY, J.
ksa W.P.(MD).No.16690 of 2023
12.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY A.Sikandar Basha, Secretary, Hajarath Seyyadhu Musthafa Darooth Masthan Avliya Darga and Pallivasal. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jafar Sirank Street, Valla Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai – 600 002. 2. The Superintendent, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.12, Kilothar Street, Trichy. 3. The Inspector, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Trichy. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner representation, dated 17.06.2002 for extending the present administrative committee of the said Darga and Pallivasal within stipulated time prescribed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.A.Syed Shaik Alaudeen For Respondents : Mr.G.Chandrasekar Standing Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.