- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 2 June 2023
- Bench
- S Justice R. Tharani
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 15042/2020
Judgment
O RDER
This petition is filed to quash the F.I.R in Crime No.405 of 2019, on the file of the first respondent.
¶2This matter was listed before me on 12.04.2023, there was no representation for the petitioners, hence, the case was posted to
27.04.2023. On 27.04.2023, when the matter was listed, there was no representation on the side of the petitioners and hence, the case was posted to 28.04.2023.
¶3On 28.04.2023, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation on the side of the petitioners. Hence, the matter was adjourned to 02.06.2023, under the caption "for arguments or for orders". Even today, ie. on 02.06.2023, there was no representation on the side of the petitioners.
¶4This Petition is pending for the past three years, that is, from 2020. The learned counsel for the respondents ready for arguments. There is no use in keeping the case pending any further. Hence, this Petition is dismissed for default. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No
02.06.2023 Internet : Yes/No Ls
To
1.The Inspector of Police, Thoothukudi Central Police Station, Thoothukudi District.
2.The Section Officer, Criminal Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R.THARANI. J. Ls
02.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.THARANI Crl.O.P.(MD) No.15042 of 2020 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.7211 of 2020 & 5425 of 2023 1.Thibaharan @ Jeyamohan 2.Gangatharan 3.Juli ... Petitioners / Accused Nos.1, 3 & 4 Vs. 1.The Inspector of Police, Thoothukudi Central Police Station, Thoothukudi District. (Crime No.405 of 2019) ...1st Respondent / Complainant 2.Koilraj ... 2nd Respondent/defacto complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records relating to the Crime No.405 of 2019, on the file of the first respondent and to quash the same against the petitioners. For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate(crl.side) for R1 : Mr.Antony Arul Raj for R2
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.