- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 11 July 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 16627/2023
Judgment
O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the second respondent to accept the one time settlement amount paid by the petitioner in connection with the loan and return the original documents to the petitioner.
¶2Since the present Writ Petition has been filed as against the private Bank, it cannot be maintained within the domain of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as the private Bank is not entrusted with the public duty.
¶3In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
11.07.2023 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No ssb
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ssb
11.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Rengaraju ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Hon'ble Ombudsman/General Manager, C/o.Reserve Bank of India, Regional Office, Fort Glacis, No.16, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001. 2.The Manager, ICICI Bank, Thillainagar Branch, Trichy, Trichy District. 3.The Manager, ICICI Bank, Kovilpatti Branch, Trichy District. ...Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to give proper direction to the second respondent to accept the one-time settlement amount paid by the petitioner in connection with the Loan A/c No.LFTR100006005453 and Loan A/c No.LFTR10000636600 subsequently close the same and to return the petitioner's original documents to the petitioner forthwith in respect of his agricultural properties situated in Kodumbapatti Village, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District in Survey Nos.406/3B and 406/5 which was furnished as secured assets to the loan accounts by considering the petitioner's representation dated 03.04.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Pitchai Muthu
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.