Irulayi v. The Sub Registrar

O R D E R The petitioner has filed the present writ petition on the ground that the respondent has insisted for production of FMB Sketch and layout for registering a Will executed by her.

¶2Today, when this Writ Petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent, on written instruction which has been received from the respondent, submits that the respondent has never insisted for any FMB Sketch or layout from the petitioner.

¶3Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent, this Writ Petition is closed. However, the respondent is directed to register the Will within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

11.07.2023 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No ssb To The Sub Registrar, The Registration Office, Chettikulam, Madurai.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ssb

11.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Irulayi ... Petitioner Vs. The Sub Registrar, The Registration Office, Chettikulam, Madurai. ...Respondent PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to register the Will without insisting the production of FMB Sketch and layout for Survey Nos.388/5, 404/6 and 404/7. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Satheesh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Thiraviyam Government Advocate