- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 14 July 2023
- Bench
- M. Nirmal Kumar
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 17889/2021
Judgment
O R D E R This petition has been filed calling for records relating to the impugned order made by the first respondent in Mu.Mu.A.2/3636/2021 dated 31.08.2021 and quash the same as illegal.
¶2The second respondent made a complaint to the first respondent against the petitioner for the reason that the petitioner was running a bakery shop in the residential area without any proper license. Based upon the complaint given by the second respondent, first respondent had conducted enquiry and found that the petitioner running the bakery shop without any proper permission and license. Thereafter, the first respondent directed the petitioner to close the bakery shop. Challenging the same, the present writ petition is filed before this Court.
¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the counsel for the second respondent submitted that now the bakery shop was closed.
¶4In view of the above submission, no specific order is required. Hence, this writ petition is closed. No Costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
14.07.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No tta To
1.Revenue Divisional Officer cum Executive Magistrate, Paramakudi Division, Ramanathapuram District.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. tta Dated : 14.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.07.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR and W.P(MD).No.14761 of 2021 Thaynese Susai Prakasam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Revenue Divisional Officer cum Executive Magistrate, Paramakudi Division, Ramanathapuram District. 2.Fathima Mary ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order made by the first respondent in Mu.Mu.A.2/3636/2021 dated 31.08.2021 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff Ajmal Associates For R1 : Mr.M.Meenakshi Sundaram Additional Public Prosecutor For R2 : Mr.S.Rajasekar
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.