Shanmugavel v. The Superintendent of Police

O RDER

This Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking for a direction to the respondent Police not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry on a complaint given by the third respondent.

¶2It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that respondent No.3 is the wife of the petitioner, who walked out of the matrimonial home voluntarily allegedly on account of gap of age between the petitioner and the third respondent. Subsequently, respondent No.3 is stated to have filed a complaint before the second respondent Police that thirty sovereigns of gold have been kept with the petitioner, and that he is not returning them to her.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No.3 has not given any jewellery to him. Mr.G.Rajan, Advocate appearing for respondent No.3 has submitted that during the course of enquiry before the third respondent, the third respondent has submitted the bills to show that thirty sovereigns of gold was purchased at the time of marriage and the petitioner has admitted to return 16 sovereigns of gold. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of a pressure of the police, the petitioner had to undertake to return sixteen sovereigns of gold.

¶4Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) on the other hand submits that the police have enquired basing on a representation of respondent No.3 and there was no force either on the petitioner or on the respondents or on any aspect whatsoever including in respect of undertaken given by petitioner. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) also submitted that the petitioner will not have any objections, if the petitioner wanted to accompany along with the Advocate to enquire.

¶5Considering the undertaking given by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), both the parties are directed to appear before the police on 19.07.2023 and on such appearance, the police are directed to complete the enquiry and close the petition within a period of two weeks thereafter and it is needless to say that none of the parties to this petition shall be harassed by the petitioner.

¶6With these observations, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of.

Index : Yes/No

12.07.2023 Internet : Yes/No tsg DR.D.NAGARJUN. J.

tsg To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Theni District, Theni.

2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Theni.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

12.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.12555 of 2023 Shanmugavel ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Theni District, Theni. 2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Theni. 3.Shalini ...Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the complaint foisted by the third respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar For R1 and R2 : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh Government Advocate Crl.Side) For R-3 : Mr.G.Rajan