VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

M.Arunkumar v. The Director General of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
25 August 2023
Bench
M.S. Rameshauthor
Case no.
SUB A(MD) 188/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Friday, the Twenty Fifth day of August Two Thousand and Twenty Three PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.S.RAMESH SUB A(MD). No.188 of 2023 in CONT P(MD)No. 586 of 2022 M.Arunkumar ... Petitioner/Petitioner/Petitioner Vs

¶1The Director General of Police O/o. the Director General of Police Dr.Radhakrishnan Road , Mylappore , Chennai - 4.

¶2The Chairman Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board , Old Commissioner of Police Office Campus Pathern Road Egmore Chennai - 600 008.

¶3The Superintendent of Police O/o. Superintendent of Police Ramanathapuram District. ... Contemnors/Respondent/ Respondent Prayer in SUB A(MD)188 /2023 :- This Contempt Miscellaneous Petition filed under section151 of CPC. the contempt petition in contempt petition (MD).No.586 of 2022 for issuing statutory notice to the contemnors / Respondents. Prayer in CONT P(MD). 586/ 2022 : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to initiate contempt proceedings against the Contemnors / Respondents and punish them for the wilful disobedience of this Honourable High Court order in W.P. (MD) No. 8285 of 2020 dated 19.01.2021. Prayer in WP(MD). 8285/ 2020 : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in C.No.A3/32064/2017 dated 24-10-2019 on the file of the Respondent No.3 and quash the same as illegal and consequently to issue a direction, directing the respondent No.3 to appoint the petitioner (Enrolment No.2805175) in the post of Grade -II Police Constable in Tamil Nadu Spl.Police Youth Brigade, wtihin the time stipulated by this Honourable Court ORDER:- This Sub Application coming on for orders on this day and upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Ms. Muniasamy, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Ms. D.Sasikumar, Government Advocate for the respondent(s), this Court made the following order: The reason assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the present application seeking for reopening of the contempt petition is not satisfactory. Merely becaue there is no bar for taking up a contempt petition when the writ appeal is pending and there are no interim orders, does not mandate the learned Single Judge to compulsorily hear the contempt petition. As such no interferference is required. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) // True Copy // /09/2023 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) TO

¶1The Director General of Police O/o. the Director General of Police Dr.Radhakrishnan Road ,Mylappore , Chennai - 4.

¶2The Chairman Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board Old Commissioner of Police Office Campus Pathern Road, Egmore Chennai - 600 008.

¶3The Superintendent of Police O/o. Superintendent of Police Ramanathapuram District.

¶4The Special Govt. Pleader, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ORDER DATED : 25/08/2023 ==========================

ORDER ==========================

SUB A(MD). No.188 of 2023 in CONT P(MD)No. 586 of 2022 Giving direction and etc. as stated within.

KSR(07.09.2023) 4P/ 5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17.07.2023.

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.